Friday, December 30, 2011

Minister for Status of Women Calls for End of Sex-Selection Abortion

My kind of feminism:

Sex-selection feticide denies millions of girls the right to be born merely because they are girls.

This is the first I've heard of Rona Ambrose declaring a "right to be born". She has never declared herself to be pro-life so far as I know.

H/T: ARPA Canada

Two abortionists charged with murder

Another item for the "Abortion is a Shady Business" file.

The investigation began in August 2010 after a botched procedure at Brigham's Elkton clinic. An 18-year-old woman who was 21 weeks pregnant had her uterus ruptured and her bowel injured, and rather than call 911, Brigham and Riley drove her to a nearby hospital, where both were uncooperative and Brigham refused to give his name, authorities said.

A search of the clinic after the botched abortion revealed a freezer with 35 late-term fetuses inside, including one believed to have been aborted at 36 weeks, authorities said.

But hey, if a fetus has to die in the name of autonomy, then tough luck fetus! Right feminists? Right! It's fetus focus fallacy to care about the fate of unborn children.




A Case of Demonic Possession

Discussed by a psychiatrist.


Thursday, December 29, 2011

Sharia: The Best Kind of AIDS prevention?

The study for this abstract was produced by members of the Islamic Medical Association of Uganda:

The study was done to determine the association between religiosity and behaviors likely to reduce new HIV infections among 1,224 Muslim youth.

Respondents with Sujda, the hyperpigmented spot on the forehead due to prostration during prayers, were more likely to abstain from sex, be faithful in marriage, and avoid alcohol and narcotics.

Males wearing a Muslim cap were more likely to abstain from sex and avoid alcohol and narcotics.

Females wearing the long dress (Hijab) were also more likely to avoid alcohol.

This data should be used by stakeholders in promoting behaviors likely to reduce new HIV infections among Muslims.

I note the silence about the relationship between the hijab and sexual abstinence. Isn't the whole point of the hijab to preserve sexual purity?

Uganda: Muslim Extremist Throws Acid on Christian Pastor

The Christian Telegraph:

Compass Direct News (CDN) says Bishop Umar Mulinde, 37, a sheikh (Islamic teacher) before his conversion to Christianity, was attacked on Saturday night (Dec. 24) outside his Gospel Life Church International building in Namasuba, about 10 kilometers (six miles) outside of Kampala.

CDN reported that from his hospital bed in Kampala, the bishop told Compass that he was on his way back to the site for a party with the entire congregation and hundreds of new converts to Christianity when a man who claimed to be a Christian approached him.

“I heard him say in a loud voice, ‘Pastor, pastor,’ and as I made a turn and looked at him, he poured the liquid onto my face as others poured more liquid on my back and then fled away shouting, ‘Allahu akbar [God is greater],’” Mulinde said, still visibly traumatized two days after the assault.

Mulinde’s face, neck and arms bore deep black scars from the acid, and his lips were swollen, CDN said.

A doctor told Compass that acid burns cover about 30 percent of his face and has cost him sight in one eye.

...

CDN also stated that on Oct. 15, area Muslim leaders declared a fatwa against him demanding his death. Mulinde is known for debates locally and internationally in which he often challenges Muslims regarding their religion.

I wish more people had his courage.

The silver lining is that the suffering of Christians sows the seeds of conversion.

Video: Dumbed-Down Catholicism is the Problem

At about 3:30 of this video, Fr. Barron tells an anecdote that sums up what's wrong with Catholicism as it is handed down to our youth.



One of the big reasons I am Catholic today is that I was lucky enough to have a religion teacher who taught me the rudiments of Thomism in Grade 10.

Once I had those rudimentary points in hand, I could understand Catholicism on my own.

As far as I'm concerned, if you don't understand basic Thomism, you will never have a profound grasp of Church teaching. Your understanding will always be superficial.

That's not to say that every great writer in the Church has been a Thomist. St. Teresa of Avila had some very profound things to say. And she was not very educated.

But everything the Church teaches and preaches will be compatible with Thomism.

But we don't get that. We're scared of frightening everyone off. It's true, it's a bit challenging. It may not be Catholicism 101. But must we always remain at a level of Catholicism 101 in the Church? I wish the pastors would sometimes leave aside their anecdotes and their pop psychology-- cute and relevant as it may be to many people-- to probe deeper into our faith by referencing the great Catholic writers of the ages. I know many people's religious education has been mediocre and they don't have a clue who Thomas Aquinas is. Must pastors speak to the level of that mediocrity?

Nobody is going to run kicking and screaming from the pews because the preist referenced a line about grace in Augustine or a line from Aquinas on morality. If anything, the novelty of it might compel them to read up on them. There are people in our Church who don't have a clue on theology. Not a blessed clue. Grace, merit, redemption, salvation, Revelation, penance, sacraments, and on and on. And clergy seem afraid to refer to these ideas, instead of focusing on issues relating to psychology and personal relations.

As if our faith had nothing to do with those basic theological ideas.

People would not be scared off by a judicious use of great Catholic writers. If anything, it would push them to think more. Instead of relying on touchy-feely do-goodism, they would have something to think about (and assent to!) rather than something that just makes

Oh Lord, that pastors would understand this.

This is one reason I started The Catholic Breadbox. I've always liked quotations, because they're a neat way to introduce new ideas in a digestible format.

Planned Parenthood inserted IUD's when the woman was pregnant

Shocking details from Abby Johnson:


Our protocol stated that IUDs could be inserted on pregnant women in order to cause an abortion. Yes. You read that right. If a woman came in and was early pregnant, we would insert an IUD to cause an abortion. She would have only been a few days pregnant. A pregnancy test would not have shown up positive. We didn’t have a confirmation of pregnancy. Out of sight, out of mind, right? How many children have been aborted because of this dangerous protocol? What is the real number of abortions performed by Planned Parenthood? We will never know. Did we tell patients that this protocol would abort their child? Of course not.

...

A woman came in one day complaining of severe abdominal pain. She had an IUD. During her exam, it was determined that her IUD was the source of her discomfort…it would have to be removed. I came in to assist. I couldn’t believe what I saw. On the end of that IUD was a tiny baby. We estimated the child to be 9 weeks. That baby had been growing on the end of a birth control device. But not to worry, Planned Parenthood says IUDs are safe.

So they inserted this IUD to provoke an abortion. The thing is, the baby doesn't always die. So this baby could continue to grow with this IUD until a miscarriage much later on in the pregnancy.

That is so scummy.

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Selena Gomez Shares Name of Unborn Sister

I would just like to say that I have zero interest in Selena Gomez. But I think the headline is culturally significant.

Selena Gomez has shared something very private and rather heart wrenching with her fans--the name of the unborn sister her mom miscarried before Christmas. The little girl's name was to have been Scarlett.

...

Some people wonder why families name miscarried babies. It used to be that unless a child was actually stillborn at or near full term that he or she wasn't usually named or memorialized with a funeral-type service. Nowadays it's far more common to hear that families have named their unborn children, and some, like the Duggar family of 19 Kids & Counting, even hold huge memorial services for their lost babies. The Duggar family even shared photos of the miscarried fetus they named Jubilee Shalom Duggar.

I would like to suggest that with the advent of widespread ultrasound, the humanity of the unborn child has been made more obvious to our culture.

Monday, December 26, 2011

Lesbian parenting studies flawed

Wendy Wright:

One study that got a lot of attention a few years ago had the official-sounding title “The U.S. National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study.” It followed lesbian parents over 25 years and reported that the kids were well-adjusted and had fewer behavioral problems than their peers.

Who evaluated the kids?

The lesbian parents.

Who labeled them well-adjusted?

The researcher, whose funding for the survey came from lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender advocacy groups.

The mothers were interviewed over the 25 year period, beginning at pregnancy or the insemination process, then when the children were 2, 5, 10 and 17 years old. The children were interviewed at 10-years old and did an online survey at 17 years old.

The lesbian couples were self-selected, recruited in higher-income, high-education areas, were overwhelmingly Caucasian, and nearly all in the Northeast and West of the U.S. The comparison group was a cross-section of the U.S. population.

MSM have significantly higher rates of STDs than straights

From a study abstract:

RESULTS:

The average prevalence of male same-sex behavior during 2005-2008 (5.0%; 95% CI: 4.5 to 5.6) differed by both age and race/ethnicity (2.3% among non-Hispanic black men; 7.4% among non-Hispanic white men).

Compared with MSW, MSM differed significantly on all demographics and reported a higher prevalence of condom use at last sex (62.9% vs. 38.3%) and of past-year HIV testing (53.6% vs. 27.2%) but also more past-year sex partners.

MSM HIV and P&S syphilis rates were 2526.9/100,000 and 707.0/100,000, each of which was over 140 times MSW rates. Rates were highest among young and black MSM.

Over 4 years, HIV rates more than doubled and P&S syphilis rates increased 6-fold among 18-year-old to 29-year-old MSM.

CONCLUSIONS:

The substantial population of MSM in New York City is at high risk for acquisition of sexually transmitted infections given high rates of newly diagnosed infections and ongoing risk behaviors. Intensified and innovative efforts to implement and evaluate prevention programs are required.

Note once again that gays have far higher rates of sexually transmitted disease than straights. Much higher. Even with greater condom usage.




Source:
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011 Dec 1;58(4):408-16.
Men who have sex with men have a 140-fold higher risk for newly diagnosed HIV and syphilis compared with heterosexual men in New York City.
Pathela P, Braunstein SL, Schillinger JA, Shepard C, Sweeney M, Blank S.
Bureau of Sexually Transmitted Disease Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City, NY, USA. ppathela@health.nyc.gov

Sunday, December 25, 2011

HUMOUR: If Joseph and Mary Had Facebook

I actually choked up a little at this video.

Merry Christmas!

Thursday, December 22, 2011

Fetal Rights Victory! Utah high court rules fetuses are 'minor children'

Four of the five justices conclude the "plain language" of the term "minor child" includes an unborn child.

I had to laugh at this statement:

Justice Ronald Nehring disagrees. He says calling a fetus a "minor child" is far from general usage and is specific to anti-abortion rhetoric.

Except "child" is what everyone calls a fetus, even Canadian law.

Cardinal Pell for Pope!

When Pell became archbishop of Melbourne in 1996, Catholic Lite was the order of the day throughout the country, with the usual results: goofball liturgy (one bishop celebrated Mass made up as a clown); dumbed-down catechesis; a collapse in religious vocations and seminary applications; the Church bureaucracy joined at the hip to the hard left in Australian public life. Reversing this drift toward theological and moral incoherence and public irrelevance was going to be very hard work. Then Pell caught a break: when his seminary faculty threatened to resign en masse because he insisted that the seminarians attend daily Mass, Pell called their bluff, accepted their resignations, filled the seminary with new faculty — and never looked back.


Wow. A bishop with some serious chutzpah.

Cloning is against the Catholic faith, but I wonder if God could make an exception in this case.

I know it is naive to call for the election to the papacy of an Australian Cardinal who does not seem to have much to do with the Vatican machinery.

But stranger things have happened. The Catholic world needs some of his candour and no non-sense approach to the faith.

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Study examined whether feticide improves "surgical outcomes" in dismemberment abortions

From a study abstract:


Objective: To determine whether potassium chloride (KCl)-induced feticide prior to termination by dilation and evacuation (D&E) improves surgical outcome.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of women who underwent second-trimester (13 0/7 to 23 6/7 weeks) D&E at an urban university-based hospital between January 2000 and July 2010. Women were divided into 3 cohorts: (1) D&E for termination of pregnancy after feticide, (2) D&E without feticide, and (3) D&E for spontaneous pregnancy loss. We compared maternal characteristics, various perioperative variables, and surgical outcomes for all 3 groups. Anesthesia time was used as a surrogate for operative time in the primary outcome.

Results: We analyzed 128 pregnancies (group 1: n = 23, group 2: n = 53, group 3: n = 52). Baseline maternal characteristics did not differ among the 3 groups. Anesthesia time was longest in the termination with KCl group (group 1: 116.9 min vs. group 2: 94.5 min and group 3: 90.3 min, p = 0.004), however, the effect was mitigated after controlling for fetal size (p = 0.176). There was no difference in blood loss (p = 0.968). Complications were uncommon, however, cervical lacerations were more common in the termination with KCl group (2 vs. 0 and 0, p = 0.010).

Conclusion: Presurgical feticide with KCl was not associated with shorter anesthesia time. The decision to perform feticide should be based on other considerations, such as patient preference.

So what they're trying to do is determine whether injecting a fetus with potassium chloride (usually in the heart) speeds up the abortion. Because goodness knows, time is money!

The researchers decided to measure the time the anesthetic was operative (I'm assuming. I doubt it takes anesthesia 117 minutes to kick in, judging from my experience in childbirth).

It appears that injecting fetuses with KCl does not speed up abortion.

I would say "thank goodness for small mercies" except that it's debatable whether death by dismemberment is a less painful and more dignified death than death by an injection of potassium chloride to the heart. Would you rather die of a painful heart attack or of getting your head crushed?

Source:
Fetal Intracardiac Potassium Chloride Injection to Expedite Second-Trimester Dilation and Evacuation
Sareena Singha, Neil S. Seligmanb, Brittany Jacksona, Vincenzo Berghellaa
aDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa., and
bDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, N.Y., USA
Fetal Diagn Ther (DOI: 10.1159/000333815)

The sooner we reject contraception, the sooner we win

Dave Armstrong on how to win fetal rights:


The easiest way to accomplish it would be for Christians to actually have a lot more children than secularists, and to raise them as good Christian disciples. If we did that, legal abortion would be completely over in 20 years. We would conquer by demographics. But unfortunately, we have bought the anti-life contraceptive mentality, and so we are little different from the surrounding pagan culture; hence abortion goes on and on.

The article I posted above about 80% of young evangelicals being sexually active supports my point exactly about how compromised we are with the sexual insanity of this culture, leading to abortion, since having sex sort of leads to babies coming into existence, even despite all the marvelous anti-life techniques and devices.

How do 80% of young Evangelicals have sex?

With contraception.

Guess how many go on to have abortions and be the subject of articles by Joyce Arthur?

I understand the difficulty with these kids: chastity is a community thing.

When the community does not look out for the youth, when it virtually pushes them to have sex, then yes, they will have sex.

And Planned Parenthood will be there with the condoms and the abortions to facilitate that.

And these Evangelicals (not to mention other Christians) will not have the moral force to oppose contraception.

And since contraception fails, abortion will always be the back up for at least some of them.

Contraception is the gateway to abortion.

It's not only the gateway for those who want to have sex outside of marriage.

It's the gateway in the sense that the contraceptive mentality stops pro-lifers from having more kids.

If we pro-lifers had an average of 3 kids per person, and raised them to be pro-life, we could end abortion in this country in the next couple of generations. It's the most politically feasible method. We don't have to ask anyone's permission to do it. It would be poetic justice for this "reproductive choice" to end "reproductive choice".

But there are a lot of pro-lifers out there who still use contraception and don't realize the significance of their choices and attitudes. Part of it is that they've never been exposed to another alternative. Part of it is that even we serious pro-lifers are only begin to articulate the moral and anthropological significance of contraception and its relationship to abortion.

Some people might object to women being treated as "incubators".

But I'm talking about women choosing for themselves to have three or more children.

I'm not talking about imposing a "quota" on women.

Pro-life women can choose to have three kids or not. But if they do, they would probably get that much closer to ending abortion in this country.

And in any event, welcoming children into the world is what pro-lifers naturally do.



Misleading Sexual Partners About HIV Status Among Persons Living with HIV/AIDS.

From an abstract...formatted for easier reading:

Most people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) disclose their serostatus to their sexual partners and take steps to protect their partners from HIV.

Prior research indicates that some PLWHA portray themselves to their sexual partners as HIV-negative or otherwise misrepresent their HIV status.

The aim of this study was to document the prevalence of misleading sexual partners about HIV status and to identify factors associated with misleading.

A sample of 310 PLWHA completed a self-administered questionnaire assessing demographic information, disclosure, HIV knowledge, HIV altruism, psychopathy, and sexual risk behavior. Participants were also asked "Since you were diagnosed as having HIV, have you ever misled a sexual partner about your HIV status?" Overall, 18.6% of participants indicated that they had misled a sexual partner. Those who had misled a partner at some point since their diagnosis reported more current HIV transmission risk behaviors, including unprotected anal or vaginal sex with a partner who was HIV-negative or whose HIV status was unknown.

Participants who had misled a partner did not differ from those who had not in terms of demographic characteristics.

Individuals who had misled a partner scored significantly lower on a measure of HIV knowledge than those who had not misled a partner. HIV altruism and psychopathy were associated with sexual risk behavior, but did not differ between those who had misled and those who had not.

Disclosure of HIV status can reduce HIV transmission, but only if people are candid. Interventions aimed at increasing knowledge and accurate disclosure may reduce the spread of HIV.

Given that there is more HIV among gays and drug users, it only makes sense that such disclosures are less frequent.

As it is, only 2% of men self-identify as gay. That means your pool of partners is small to begin with. If you have HIV, you will diminish your pool of partners even more.

Now, if a person who is HIV positive has trouble finding partners because of their status, the logical answer is "well too bad, don't start infecting everyone else just because you have it."

It's called exercising personal responsibility and self-control.

Alas, no. That would make too much sense.

The response from one body of researchers:


VANCOUVER, British Columbia, December 19, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A team of HIV/AIDS researchers from B.C. have called upon the Canadian legal system to stop prosecuting people infected with the HIV virus for failing to disclose their sickness to their sexual partners.

The team, directed by Dr. Julio Montaner, claims that current HIV treatment can reduce the risk of transmitting the virus by as much as 96%.

I can just see it now, thousands of men will say to their partners: "You can't get HIV, I'm being treated for it!"

Just like many women think they can't get pregnant because they're on birth control, and their birth control method only has a 1% failure rate.

“Prosecutions put the life of people living with HIV/AIDS at risk, increase the risk of HIV transmission and health care costs, and ultimately place the public at higher risk,” the authors argue.

It increases the risk because people don't take responsibility.

If their lack of responsibility causes someone serious harm, like contracting a life-altering disease, they should pay for it. That should be a deterrent. I don't expect drug users to care about the law, but most people would pay heed.

And I have another ethical question:

Shouldn't having sex with someone who does not disclose HIV status amount to some form of sexual assault? It's grossly unfair for the innocent victim to have to suffer a lifetime of sexual disease because of one partner's dishonesty.







Ontario MP wishes to examine human rights for the unborn

Yes please!

Let's stop this non-sense about choice.

Let's get every MP to state their position:

Do you believe that an unborn child is a human being?

Do you believe that human rights are for every human being?

Yes or No?

Because this is ultimately what it's about: whether you believe that a fetus is a human being, and that all human beings deserve rights.

Or you don't.

I'm glad that the issue was framed with the intent of examining the status of the unborn child.

Women are not the only ones affected by abortion.

Woman dies at abortion clinic in Melbourne


QUOTE:


Over the past six years the clinic has been investigated several times, most recently in August when late-term abortionist and owner Dr. Mark Schulberg performed an abortion on 40-year-old Pheap Sem, who was rushed to Melbourne’s Box Hill Hospital in critical condition following the procedure.

Earlier this year the anesthetist at the abortion facility, James Latham Peters, was charged with 54 counts each of conduct endangering life, negligence causing serious injury and recklessness causing serious injury, after he allegedly infected dozens of women with Hepatitis C. Police said that the investigation will continue until all the clients of the clinic between 2006 and 2009 have been tested for the infection, and that Dr. Peters could face further charges.

Paula Shelton, the lawyer for the 54 women infected with Hepatitis C, said her clients have raised questions about why health authorities allowed Dr. Peters to continue practicing when there was mounting evidence concerning his own drug use, the illegal supply of drugs he provided to others, and charges of possessing child-pornography.

Gee, a perverted junkie doing abortions. Never heard of that before!

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Monument to the unborn dedicated in Slovakia (excellent pro-life art!)

Jeanne Smits reports that a group of young mothers in Slovakia commissioned a statue dedicated to the unborn. According to her blogpost, it was inaugurated in the presence of the Slovak minister of health. It is called "The Child Who was Never Born."

It was created by a young sculptor named Martin Hudáčeka.


I think we should widely diffuse this picture. It's so iconic.

Georgia Abortionist Charged With Medicaid Fraud


Have you ever noticed that it seems that abortionists are regularly being caught doing something illegal?

H/T: Jivin' J.

China: Contraceptive museum plan misfires

Eastday.com:

PLANS to build a museum devoted to contraceptives in a base where teenagers receive military training has created controversy among the public.

(...)

It would include a 10,000-square-meter hall, an education center and a contraceptive theme park - no details of which were provided.

The jokes practically write themselves but I think they might be a little too explicit for this blog...

The proposed museum would tell the story of contraception in China through the ages and detail the achievements of birth control in Rudong County, government officials told the newspaper.

Somehow I doubt there will be an exhibit entitled "I can't get pregnant I'm on birth control!"

But the proposal has been criticized by some nearby residents who claim it would be inappropriate to locate the museum in a suburban area where young people are sent each year for military training, according to the newspaper report.

See, a lot of Chinese are sane and have a sense of decency, unlike their government.

"But I can't get pregnant, I'm on birth control"

People really do act like contraception is fullproof.


Headline: I can't stop getting pregnant! Mother conceives six times in five years despite using every contraceptive precaution

And look at the comments:

"Yeah right! We should all be so gullible as to believe this!"

"Vasectomy? Sterilisation? Both? The answer is simples people."

"If combined with a condom, there's no way in the world you can get pregnant!"

This belief in the infallibility of birth control is in part what is fueling the abortion rate. The mother featured in the Daily Mail article opposes abortion (thank goodness) but even women who oppose abortion change their minds once pregnant.




Sunday, December 18, 2011

Another episode of "I wonder why self-abortion is a crime"

From article in Uganda:

In Uganda buying abortion pills has become as easy as buying sweets. Our undercover reporter went to a number of pharmacies in Kampala and procured the pills, to find out how easy it is.

What do you suppose happens if self-abortion is not a crime?

Dollars to doughnuts, abortion pill pushers will come on the scene.

We know it's already being done in New York City.

Women put themselves into a lot of danger when they attempt abortion by themselves because they're at the mercy of advice like this:
I walked into another pharmacy, disrupting a light-skinned lady who was reading a newspaper. I told her I needed to terminate my pregnancy. “Three months, it is no longer blood,” she said. She asked me to pay sh25,000 and asked that I have a seat.

After three minutes, she called me and instructed me on how to use the tablets. “I am not very sure whether these drugs will do the miscarriage because your pregnancy is a bit advanced. These drugs are effective in the first eight weeks of pregnancy but give it a try.”

I'm not sure if this will work, but here, try it! What could possibly go wrong!

Except a retained fetus or placenta. No biggee!

The reason it's a crime for women to self-abort is the same reason we have seatbelt laws.

Study: An unusual complication of unsafe abortion

Gee, I wonder why self-abortion should is a crime...

Unsafe abortion is a significant medical and social problem worldwide. In developing countries, most of the unsafe abortions are performed by untrained personnel leading to high mortality and morbidity

A lot unsafe abortions are done by untrained professionals in the First World, too. Note the implicit confusion between legality and safety.


CASE REPORT: A 30 year-old female, gravida 7, para 6 underwent uterine evacuation for heavy bleeding per vaginum following intake of abortifacient to abort a 14 weeks gestation.

Note that chemical abortions are performed up to 7 weeks in India. This lady was attempting self-abortion...

The procedure was performed at a rural setup and her bowel was pulled out of the introitus through the perforated wound, an unusual complication of unsafe abortion.

Yeah, totally unusual for intestines to be ripped out by untrained professionals... except that's the horror story all the abortion advocates told to justify *legalizing abortion*.

Illiteracy, unawareness about health services, and easy accessibility to untrained abortion providers lead to very high mortality and morbidity in India.

But access to abortion pill pushers in the First World won't lead to any deaths at all...

Source:
J Family Community Med. 2011 Sep;18(3):165-7.
An unusual complication of unsafe abortion.
Gupta S, Chauhan H, Goel G, Mishra S.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Subharti Institute of Medical Sciences, Uttar Pradesh, India.




Saturday, December 17, 2011

Safe Sex and Safe Smoking: The Parallel

Dr. Frank, insightful as ever:

When physicians first recognized an association between smoking and lung disease, an early approach that gained widespread popularity was adding filters to the cigarettes. Since people were going to smoke anyway (so it seemed), what better solution could there be than “safe smoking”? What foolish and religious nonsense to think that you could ever convince people to stop smoking, especially since so many youth were beginning to smoke? I wonder if anyone ever thought of passing out filtered cigarettes in schools to protect the children of the close-minded parents who didn’t accept this new progressive wisdom. Surely someone must have come up with a plan to teach the more sheltered school children about all the different varieties of tobacco products and the various ways in which they could be ingested. Imagine how much danger these children would face if not given such life-saving “health” information?

Hindsight is 20/20. We have since learned that “safe smoking” with filtered cigarettes wasn’t so safe after all. It simply forced people to suck harder while drawing the smaller carcinogenic smoke particles to deeper parts of the lungs. We then saw a shift from cancer in the large airways (like the trachea and bronchi), to the smaller airways (like the alveoli). Guess which cancer was more deadly. Yes, the ones involving the smaller airways. Fortunately, the medical community recognized this and made a radical shift in policy. We decided that as challenging as this may be, we had to encourage people to fundamentally change their behavior and abstain from cigarettes altogether. It’s not an easy answer, but we unanimously agree that it is the only one we can with integrity endorse. In fact, a physician would be thoroughly condemned if he or she failed to counsel a smoking patient to quit such harmful behavior. The attention given to smoking cessation is now unrivaled among health advocacy topics; unrivaled except perhaps by the current “safe sex with condoms” campaigns. Let us hope that sound reason and logic can soon correct the false religion of salvation by latex.

I realize that people develop sexual feelings on their own, whereas smoking is not inborn.

Nonetheless, smoking is an addiction. Sex is not. (Although it's treated like it is.)

And yet we devote a heckuva a lot of energy and resources to get people to quit.

Imagine if we devoted as much energy to help people become chaste.

Even if you reduce your non-marital sexual activity by 90% you do a heckuva lot to prevent yourself from getting a disease or getting someone pregnant.

But no, let's not try to convince people of the benefits of toning down their sexual activity or quitting altogether until they find the person they want to marry.

Friday, December 16, 2011

"Despite increased use of modern contraception among Mexican women, there has been a significant increase in abortions. "

Says study abstract.

We told you so.

Only 8% of participants disagreed with abortion completely. Those with mixed views opposed abortion for pregnancies resulting from lack of responsibility or due to personal problems or concerns about one's future. However, these more controversial reasons were the primary motivations for terminating pregnancies.

These are the reasons contraception is used. And guess what? Contraception fails. And the reasons for contraception become the reasons for abortion. It's a no-brainer.

"But there's no stigma to abortion"

Social stigma and disclosure about induced abortion: results from an exploratory study.
The paper is based upon focus groups and semi-structured in-depth interviews conducted with women and men in Mexico, Nigeria, Pakistan, Peru and the United States (USA) in 2006. The stigma of abortion was perceived similarly in both legally liberal and restrictive settings although it was more evident in countries where abortion is highly restricted. Personal accounts of experienced stigma were limited, although participants cited numerous social consequences of having an abortion.

But there's no stigma whatsoever to abortion.

No matter how legal abortion is, it will always be understood that it kills a human being. And that will always bring with it a stigma. It doesn't matter how "liberating" it is.

Thursday, December 15, 2011

Stories of Sexual Abuse Surface in Attawapiskat

CTV:

Iahtail said she was sexually abused as a child from the age of four to 13 by four people she trusted, including relatives of some council members. She said her story is not unique in Attawapiskat, where incest and sexual abuse are endemic and span generations.

"Attawapiskat is just a small representation of what's happening at our aboriginal communities across Canada," she said.

...

She said the reasons people remain silent in small, tight-knit aboriginal communities are myriad: "Fear, retaliation are the very reasons why no one will stand up today," Iahtail said.

"For people who actually stand up there is grave retaliation, their chances of accessing housing, education funding, medical services, advocacy are few and far between because there is retaliation that takes place by our local government."

...

The scars on the community are obvious, Iahtail says: suicide, alcohol and drug abuse, gas sniffing and violence are mere symptoms. Indeed, while abuse may be less visible than squalid shacks and poor housing, it also insidious and destructive.

...

According to some estimates, the level of abuse in aboriginal communities is staggering.

"Sexual violence and sexual abuse in Aboriginal communities affect 75 to 80 per cent of our girls and women," said social worker Sylvia Maracle, from the Ontario Federation of Friendship Centres.

Among non-aboriginal girls and women the rate is closer to 20 per cent.

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

VIDEO: Homosexual Co-Opting of Catholic History



As a history graduate I could not agree with him more.

Look folks, the "queer positive" ideology began to exist within living memory. It did not exist before that. Homosexuality was not accepted. People did not think of themselves as "gay". They did not have an agenda to normalize homosexual relations. They were not trying to counter gender norms. Up until the twentieth century, practically nobody did that.

And when I say "nobody", I don't just mean no one among Catholics. I mean NOBODY. Not even atheists.

So this idea that there were gay saints, gay statesmen, gay anybody is bunk, unless the evidence specifically and explicitly points to it.

Because people did not think in those terms.

I have no problem with people discovering the truth of actual homosexuals.

I have a problem with lefitst historians who come to a conclusion based on poorly argued inferences. I saw quite a bit of that when I was a history student. The more politically correct the historian, the greater his inability to imagine alternative explanations for the evidence at hand.This was especially true when it came to Catholic history. Here's a tip: if you're going to study the history of Catholics or Catholicism, learn the faith and learn it well. That would seem like a no-brainer, but you'd be surprised at how many historians-- reputable historians-- fumbled on basic Catholic doctrine.

The boring truth, for good or for ill, is that people in the past tend to think the way we would expect them to, in tune with their century or decade. Any inference that an individual did not think in harmony with his age would need extraordinary proof, not just an inference. Otherwise it's just reading into the texts what you hope to find within them.



The Better the AIDS treatement, the More Gays Risk It

Study Abstract:

BACKGROUND:

The transmission through contacts among MSM (men who have sex with men) is one of the dominating contributors to HIV prevalence in industrialized countries. In Amsterdam, the capital of the Netherlands, the MSM risk group has been traced for decades. This has motivated studies which provide detailed information about MSM's risk behavior statistically, psychologically and sociologically. Despite the era of potent antiretroviral therapy, the incidence of HIV among MSM increases. In the long term the contradictory effects of risk behavior and effective therapy are still poorly understood.

METHODS:

Using a previously presented Complex Agent Network model, we describe steady and casual partnerships to predict the HIV spreading among MSM. Behavior-related parameters and values, inferred from studies on Amsterdam MSM, are fed into the model; we validate the model using historical yearly incidence data. Subsequently, we study scenarios to assess the contradictory effects of risk behavior and effective therapy, by varying corresponding values of parameters. Finally, we conduct quantitative analysis based on the resulting incidence data.

RESULTS:

The simulated incidence reproduces the ACS historical incidence well and helps to predict the HIV epidemic among MSM in Amsterdam. Our results show that in the long run the positive influence of effective therapy can be outweighed by an increase in risk behavior of at least 30% for MSM.

CONCLUSION:

We recommend, based on the model predictions, that lowering risk behavior is the prominent control mechanism of HIV incidence even in the presence of effective therapy.

And lowering risk behaviour, would that include....chastity?

Naaaaaaah.

It means more condoms of course!

Except more condoms translates into even MORE risky behaviour.
 
Source:
BMC Infect Dis. 2011 May 11;11:118.
Increasing risk behaviour can outweigh the benefits of antiretroviral drug treatment on the HIV incidence among men-having-sex-with-men in Amsterdam.
Mei S, Quax R, van de Vijver D, Zhu Y, Sloot PM.
Information System and Management College, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, China. MeiShan.ann@Gmail.com


Muslim Brotherhood plans to turn Egypt's holiday resorts 'sin-free'

Azza al-Jarf, a candidate for the Muslim Brotherhood, told supporters: "Tourists don't need to drink alcohol when they come to Egypt; they have plenty at home."

...

On the other hand, influential cleric Yasser Bourhami called for 'halal tourism' - which includes restrictions on Westerners.

Speaking to private television network Dream TV, he said: "A five-star hotel with no alcohol, a beach for women - sisters - separated from men in a bay where the two sides can enjoy a vacation for a week without sins."

"The tourist doesn't have to swim with a bikini and harm our youth," he added.

No tourists don't have to drink alcohol, or share a beach with the opposite sex, but they will find their vacation to be very boring.

I predict their tourism industry will tank if they have their way.

Chinese village of Wukan has had it with communism

Rebel Chinese village of Wukan 'has food for ten days'
Wukan has been encircled by a police cordon since Sunday, after an attempt by 1,000 armed officers failed to capture the village. No food or water is allowed in, and no villagers are allowed out.

But the villagers were unbowed on Wednesday and Wukan's temporary leadership said it had seen signs that the Chinese government would blink first.

...

Trouble in Wukan has been brewing since September, after the village revolted at an attempt to take one of its last parcels of farmland and give it to a major Chinese property developer, Country Garden.

However it was the death of 43-year-old Xue Jinbo, one of the village's 13 temporary representatives, in police custody that pushed Wukan into its current fury, and saw the last of the village's dozen Communist party officials flee. His family believe he was murdered.

Communism will only end when the Chinese people want it to.

But people don't think they CAN'T get pregnant on birth control... right?

"I texted my boyfriend and said I am baby-free until 2016," Margaret Nupp, 27, says of her quick visit to the gynecologist to get the five-year IUD called Mirena.

Tired of trying to remember to take the pill, Nupp was drawn to an IUD because of "the infallibility of it."

The infallibility of it...until someone actually gets pregnant with an IUD.

It doesn't matter how much sex ed you give people... they think a 1% chance of pregnancy means NO chance.

When millions of people use contraception, thousands of women end up at the abortion clinic.

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

What was it like for Mary to be pregnant?

I really liked this article about Mary's pregnancy and delivery.

It is not well-known among Catholics that Jesus was delivered of Mary through a miraculous fashion. Our modernist mentality tends to exclude of divine intervention into natural events. But there you have it, Sacred Tradition has always upheld that Mary did not suffer during labour, nor did birth affect her physical body. It has been said that Jesus was born like a shaft of light.I don't know if this is a metaphor or literally. I tend to take it metaphorically, that it's a symbol conveying the miraculous nature of the delivery rather than the actual mode of birth.

Collective Punishment Under Islam

When Muhammad cartoons deemed blasphemous by Muslims were published in Europe, Christians in faraway Muslim countries like Nigeria were killed; when Pope Benedict quoted history deemed unflattering by Muslims, anti-Christian riots around the Muslim world ensued, churches were burned, and a nun was murdered in Somalia. Months ago, when an American pastor from a fringe group burned a Koran, dozens of U.N. aid workers were killed by Muslims in Afghanistan; some were beheaded.


I never know if what non-Muslims tell me about Islam is true.


I do know about what Muslims do in the name of Islam. Whether it's "true Islam" or not is immaterial to me. I just know that some Muslims think it's "True Islam" and they kill for that reason.

In a perverse sense, this is an attempt to hijack our freedom. We don't want people to be killed in the Western World, do we? So let's not offend Muslims. Let's kowtow to their agenda. So don't say what you really think of Muhammed, Islam, or anything related, someone might die because of your words.

Maybe we should have an open door immigration policy on persecuted Christians.

H/T: The Black Kettle

Liberal Fundraising Letter is Globe and Mail News Story

But only the MSM objectively reports the news with no partisanship whatsoever.

The article starts off:

Jean Chrétien is warning Liberals that gun control and the Kyoto accord are dead because of Stephen Harper’s Tories, darkly noting that same-sex marriage and abortion rights could be next on the Conservative government’s chopping block.

That sort of brightened my day, until I read...

“Unless we are bold. Unless we seize the moment. Everything we built will start being chipped away,” the former prime minister writes in a toughly-worded fundraising letter.

It's always the end of the world in these fundraising letters. They'll write anything to get you to send money.

Question: why is a fundraising letter a newspaper article?

Mr. Chrétien’s appeal harkens back to a strategy the Liberals have used in the past, trying to scare Canadians into believing that the Tories have a hidden agenda. The question is could it backfire?

Hidden agenda? I wish!

Interim Liberal Leader Bob Rae doesn’t think so. “Watching the Republicans in Iowa on Saturday night (the bunch that provide Mr. Harper with his ‘inspiration’), I don’t think we’ve hit rock bottom yet,” Mr. Rae told The Globe in an email Tuesday morning. “We’re hitting hard and raising a lot of money. Will be announcing totals soon.”

An email? Don't reporters talk to people any more?

Haven't you guys learned that the Hidden Agenda meme is dead? Guess not.

Monday, December 12, 2011

But Female Homosexuality Poses No Harm Whatsoever

Sometimes my readers complain I only focus on the ills effects of male homosexual behaviour. Guess what:

Women who have sex with women (WSW) are a diverse group with variations in sexual identity, sexual behaviors, sexual practices, and risk behaviors. WSW are at risk of acquiring bacterial, viral, and protozoal sexually transmitted infections (STIs) from current and prior partners, both male and female. Bacterial vaginosis is common among women in general and even more so among women with female partners. WSW should not be presumed to be at low or no risk for STIs based on sexual orientation, and reporting of same-sex behavior by women should not deter providers from considering and performing screening for STIs, including chlamydia, in their clients according to current guidelines. Effective delivery of sexual health services to WSW requires a comprehensive and open discussion of sexual and behavioral risks, beyond sexual identity, between care providers and their female clients.

Did you note how the abstract says that the identity is not what matters, but the actual behaviour?

The reason I don't post often about WSW is because researchers don't study this group as much as men. I suspect the assumptions listed in the abstract might have something to do with it.

The Soviet Anti-Abortion Campaign

Just an interesting abstract, posted FYI:

"Abortion will deprive you of happiness!": Soviet reproductive politics in the post-Stalin era.


This article examines Soviet reproductive politics after the Communist regime legalized abortion in 1955. The regime's new abortion policy did not result in an end to the condemnation of abortion in official discourse. The government instead launched an extensive campaign against abortion. Why did authorities bother legalizing the procedure if they still disapproved of it so strongly? Using archival sources, public health materials, and medical as well as popular journals to investigate the antiabortion campaign, this article argues that the Soviet government sought to regulate gender and sexuality through medical intervention and health "education" rather than prohibition and force in the post-Stalin era. It also explores how the antiabortion public health campaign produced "knowledge" not only about the procedure and its effects, but also about gender and sexuality, subjecting both women and men to new pressures and regulatory norms.

Source:
Randall AE.
J Womens Hist. 2011;23(3):13-38

This might explain the Russian honesty about abortion.

New Muslim Channel Coming to Canada

Channel Q: is

devoted to programming that would strive to educate both Muslims and non-Muslims about Islamic teachings that promote brotherhood, charity, tolerance, humility and humanity. The programming would engage the audience in a meaningful discourse concerning all aspects of Islam and would promote national, ethnic and social harmony.

"Social Harmony" is the name of the politically correct governing ideology in my novel.

That phrase jumped out at me.

And yes, my novel is a first draft, with all the inherent flaws that go with it.

H/T: FFF

VIDEO: Trailer of Runaway Slave, a doc on Black Conservatives

Runaway Slave seeks to tell the story of Black Conservatives in America. It is presented within an episode of Politichicks.tv

To be widely blogged:



H/T: Patriot Update

Saturday, December 10, 2011

More on the phenomenon of cryptic pregnancy

How Can You Be Pregnant (For Months) And Not Know It?

Here are some astonishing statistics: Among pregnant women, 1 in 450 doesn't know her status until week 20 or later (more than halfway through the pregnancy), and 1 in 2,500 is oblivious until she actually goes into labor.

I had no idea that it was that common!

Only a minority of cryptic pregnancy cases has been attributed to personality disturbances (eight percent) or schizophrenia (five percent). It appears that most unexpectedly expectant mothers are perfectly sane and educated. Quite simply, they do not know they're pregnant because they have no symptoms -- no weight gain, no nausea, and little to no abdominal swelling.

Give me a pregnancy like that!

Why does this happen?

A cryptic pregnancy is an adaptive "emergency" mechanism -- essentially, the fetus sensing a threat and striking a bargain by demanding little and laying low to maximize its chances of being born.

So, if 1 in 2500 pregnancies are undetected until labour, do these women have the right to prematurely end their pregnancies at this stage?

I still haven't gotten an answer from any of my pro-abortion readers.


Poverty in Canada

Margaret Wente:

I'm not trying to be Pollyanna-ish. We have pockets of terrible deprivation in this country – just look at Attawapiskat. We still need food banks. But malnutrition is virtually extinct. Many experts argue that standard measurements of income dramatically understate the real gains in wealth, because they don’t adequately measure tax transfers and fail to reflect huge gains in purchasing power. Two American academics, Bruce Meyer of the University of Chicago and James Sullivan of the University of Notre Dame, make the startling claim that, if you take these factors into account, the incomes of U.S. middle-class families rose by more than 50 per cent in real terms between 1980 and 2009. Poor families fared almost as well.

Walmart and the rise of Chinese manufacturing has been the best thing to happen to lower income families. When I was a kid, I could buy a doll for a dollar at the dollar store. You can still do that today. Many of the products we buy today have the same prices-- or lower-- than twenty or thirty years ago. When I was in university, a computer could easily cost over $2000. Now you can buy a decent one for $500. A nice blouse cost you about $50. You can still find quality blouses for that price today. There's so much competition in pricing, there's so many savings of scale that it has allowed poor people to be able to access products that was impossible for them to purchase when I was a kid. Now you can get an air conditioner for $100 and a decent television for $200.

All this to say that there are few genuinely poor people in Canada, i.e. people who lack what they need. Walmart and capitalism has made that happen.

Friday, December 09, 2011

Pregnancy Begins at Conception Say Most American OB\GYN's

The distinction about when a pregnancy begins is important.

If pregnancy begins at conception, then hormonal-based methods of birth control would be considered abortifacient as they are designed to prevent implantation.

If pregnancy begins at implantation, then hormonal based contraception doesn't end a pregnancy-- it only prevents it. If there's no pregnancy, there's no abortion, right?

Then you have to explain away that pesky term "chemical pregnancy" in which there is a conceptus, but no implantation.

C.S. Lewis on the meaning of the "Sense of Sin"

I decided to report this C.S. Lewis quotation from The Catholic Breadbox, my Catholic quotations blog. I'm re-posting it because it is very insightful and I wish everyone would know this:

(And I think of C.S. Lewis as a "secret Catholic" even though he was Anglican. I wonder if he would have converted had he lived a few years longer).


A recovery of the old sense of sin is essential to Christianity. Christ takes it for granted that men are bad. Until we really feel this assumption of His to be true, though we are part of the world He came to save, we are not part of the audience to whom His words are addressed. We lack the first condition for understanding what He is talking about. And when men attempt to be Christians without the preliminary consciousness of sin, the result is almost bound to be a certain resentment against God as to one always inexplicably angry. Most of us have at times felt a secret sympathy with the dying farmer who replied to the Vicar’s dissertation on repentance by asking ‘What harm have I ever done to Him?’ There is the real rub. The worst we have done to God is to leave him alone—why can’t He return the compliment? Why not live and let live? What call has He, of all beings, to be ‘angry’? It’s easy for him to be good!

Now at the moment when a man feels real guilt—moments too rare in our lives—all these blasphemies vanish away. Much, we may feel, can be excused to human infirmities, but not this—this incredibly mean and ugly action which none of our friends would have done, which even such a thorough-going little rotter as X would have been ashamed of, which we would not for the world allow to be published. At such a moment, we really do know that our character, as revealed in this action, is, and ought to be, hateful to all good men, and, if there are powers above men, to them. A God who did not regard this with unappeasable distaste would not be a good being. We cannot even wish for such a God—it is like wishing that every nose in the universe were abolished, that smell of hay or roses or the sea should never again delight any creature, because our own breath happens to stink.

When we merely say that we are bad, the ‘wrath’ of God seems a barbarous doctrine; as soon as we perceive our badness, it appears inevitable, a mere corollary of God’s goodness. To keep ever before us the insight derived from such a moment as I have been describing, to learn to detect the same real inexcusable corruption under more and more of its complex disguises, is therefore indispensable to a real understanding the Christian faith. This is not, of course, a new doctrine. I am attempting nothing very splendid in this chapter. I am merely trying to get to my reader (and, still more, myself) over a pons asinorum—to take the first step out of fools’ paradise and utter illusion.


--C.S. Lewis, The Problem of Pain

VIDEO: "I Didn't Know I was Pregnant"--- and a challenge to feminists

Yesterday, I went to the gym, and while I was on the treadmill watching the tv on the wall, I discovered a new, fascinating show on TLC: "I Didn't Know I was Pregnant".

It's a show that tells the stories of women who go through nine months of pregnancy unaware of their condition until delivery.

And what do each of them say when they're told they're pregnant?

"I can't be pregnant! I'm on birth control!"

In this particular episode, the woman who is telling her story says that she did not really want children.

And yet she only discovers she is pregnant when she is in the hospital and her contractions are one minute apart and the baby is about to be delivered.

So, feminists, here's my question:

Should this mother have had the right to abort her baby at this stage of pregnancy?

We wouldn't want to support forced motherhood would we?

In case you're wondering, the mom ends up falling in love with her baby the first time she holds him.

Pro-lifers, if you have not looked into this show, you should.

One last thing: we need to promote this show far and wide to dispel the myth that you cannot become pregnant on birth control. This series shows that people think it's impossible. And even though people know theoretically it can happen, they don't think it can happen to them,. They engage in wishful thinking.






Thursday, December 08, 2011

Why the Poor-Choicers Won't Debate

Says One Canadian Poor Choicer:

So I'll give another reason, the one we all know but don't say.

Are you ready? It's earth shattering.

We don't debate because we already won.

My friends in business tell me a big rule of sales is not to sell past the close. This deal is closed, people, and we won. For us, debate is a waste of our time. In the real world, the world in which abortion is legal and considered a human right, our time is better spent ensuring access is available to all women, that those in PEI and New Brunswick who continue to flagrantly defy the law stop, and that reproductive justice is available to everyone.

It's true, in one sense. Abortion is completely legal in Canada.

When you start debating what you've won, you can lose what you have.

So Poor-Choicers don't debate. There's a great paucity of poor-choicers in my combox, even though I do not censor their (polite) comments.

So how do we make the pro-aborts lose what they have?

You persuade people.

Nevermind trying to pick a fight with poor-choicers.

Just make your argument to those in the middle. Just state the truth. The truth has a power of its own.

And when people wake up to the truth of abortion, the poor-choicers will come running.

As it is, just the fact that a poor-choicer responded says something.

Because when you're convinced you've won, you don't have to say it. Everyone knows it.

I don't give white supremacists  the time of day. I don't address genuine misogynists, the few that are still around. I don't worry about absolute monarchists.

I worry about people may potentially threaten what I value.

When poor-choicers have to remind people that they've won, that says something. 


Wednesday, December 07, 2011

Islamic cleric bans women from touchin bananas, cucumbers for sexual resemblance Islamic cleric bans women from touching bananas, cucumbers

The Good News:

The opinion has stirred a storm of irony and denouncement among Muslims online, with hundreds of comments mocking the cleric.

One reader said that these religious “leaders” give Islam “a bad name” and another commented said that he is a “retarded” person and he must quite [sic] his post immediately.

Some Muslims are showing a healthy disrespect for stupidity. Let's hope that sentiment grows.

Another item for the "Abortion is a Shady Business" File

7 former employees offer to testify against Planned Parenthood in congressional probe

But there is absolutely, positively NO STIGMA WHATSOEVER attached to abortion. Ignore those whiny feminist abortioneers who complain about it. They have no idea what they're talking about.

In a letter addressed to leaders of the House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, the former Planned Parenthood workers say they “have personally witnessed and can testify to the validity of specific concerns raised by subcommittee chairman Cliff Stearns (R-FL).”

In particular, they say Planned Parenthood has failed to notify parents when an underage girl is seeking an abortion, to detect or report cases of coerced abortion or sex trafficking, and to properly segregate government funds away from abortion costs, among other violations.

The group also pointed out that Planned Parenthood receives “roughly $1 million per day in federal-state support.” “This alone would merit close government attention as to whether or not these funds are being spent appropriately,” they write.

The shadiness of the abortion industry is the reason people leave. They realize they've been lied to and that their workplace is not healthy in any sense of the word. You don't convince people to leave an organization unless there are motives to leave (especially since you don't know if you'll get another job).


Self-abortion: where feminists really jump the shark

This RH Reality Check column comes out in favour of legalizing self-abortion--- even at late stages.

You know, if a fetus has to die in the name of women's rights, well tough luck fetus!

It also provides a clue about the age-old question about how much jailtime women would get if they were prosecuted for criminal abortion.

Criminal abortion is still on the books, and in Idaho, you face a five-year jail term for it.

The columnists are crazy enough to say:

Rarely do women who have a miscarriage need medical attention; the same is true for women having a medication abortion.

Except you have to go get checked out to make sure there is nothing left in your uterus. This is standard procedure even for natural miscarriages. About five per cent of medical abortions fail. For some do-it-yourself chemical abortions the rate can be twenty per cent. From a statistical standpoint, that's a huge number of failures.

Besides, it doesn't take a genius to figure out why late-term self-abortions should definitely be criminalized, regardless of the issue of fetal rights. First off, an abortion that late produces a dead baby corpse, which is not exactly hygienic. Then there's the question of how to dispose of such a body. After labouring for many hours, you're not necessarily in the best frame of mind to dispose of your dead baby's body. You may very well take a shortcut and throw it in the trash. The next problem is that a late-term abortion is like giving birth. If you're alone, there's a definite chance of puerperal infection, not to mention the possibility of retained placenta.

And what if there's the dreaded complication of a live birth? You can see the next nut job court ruling from a mile away: if a woman self-aborts and the baby is born live, then you she can kill it. Wouldn't want to force motherhood on anyone now, would we? It would be very oppressive for her to have to take responsibility for that post-natal fetus.

Self-abortion is obviously a bad idea. It's the 21st century version of the back alley abortion.

In fact, I can foresee the possibility of abortion drug traffickers. Think about it. There are people who deal coke and heroin, why wouldn't they deal abortion drugs at a fraction of the cost, especially so much of the underworld deals with deviant sexuality? A surgical abortion may be safer, but it's also where people report sexual crimes (in theory).

To promote it as a responsible alternative is unethical. How is it serving women to respect this choice when it's so obviously a crappy choice?

Why is self-abortion a crime? The same reason drug possession is a crime. Because if it became a widespread phenomenon it would be extremely detrimental to large numbers of people.

Tuesday, December 06, 2011

Deceptive Advertizing is why Siri won't find you an abortion clinic

From Newsbusters, quoting SearchEngineLand:
Siri’s not finding abortion clinics because Planned Parenthood and other places that perform abortions don’t call themselves that, not in their names, nor have they been associated with a category for that. That’s the best guess I have in this.

I guess they must think there's a stigma attached to having an abortion, or something...




From the "Why I don't vote Conservative" Files...Governmetn attack on Free Speech

Out of the frying pan, into the fire:

OTTAWA—The federal Conservative government intends to toughen “hate crime” offences in the Criminal Code while it supports removing offences under the Canadian Human Rights Act that deal with speech inciting hatred, says Justice Minister Rob Nicholson.

...

Nicholson said he will move to strengthen current criminal laws against inciting hatred, but he would not be more specific.

That means you, So-Cons.

Instead of paying a $17 500 fine, you'll be going to jail for your "hatred".

Maybe not now. But just wait until a leftist government gets elected. We are hanging ourselves with our own rope.

Monday, December 05, 2011

Nah...Abortionists aren't in it for the money...

Profile of a Millionaire Abortionist

If you want an abortion debate...

Demanding one isn't the way to get it.

Look, you can't have a debate with people who don't want to debate you.

There are two groups of people you can debate on the abortion debate.

1) Hardcore pro-aborts.

2) Everyone else.

The hardcore pro-aborts won't debate.

Everyone else doesn't care.

And what do I mean when I say people "don't care"?

There's a concept called saliency. Yes, most people would support a late-term abortion ban in Canada.

But support for a late-term abortion ban is a mile wide and an inch deep.

There's no saliency.

If you want an abortion, I suggest that you do it by assertion.

Just keep stating truths, and then people will be irked enough to consider it and/or debate it.

When you get enough people to care about what you're saying, that's when you will have a debate.

If there's no debate it's because not enough people care enough to debate you.

This is the reality. That's why Stephen Harper is not having an abortion debate.

Pro-life Blog Scoop of the Year: Ontario did over 43 000 abortions in 2010

Citizen journalism. This is how you do it.

CIHI reported that in 2009 there were about 30 000 abortions.

But this FOI reveals that there were 43 000 in Ontario in 2010.

Which means that CIHI failed to record approximately 30 percent of all abortions in Ontario.

This also suggests that abortions are not being properly counted in other Canadian provinces.

The federal minister responsible for CIHI should be held accountable and corrections should be made to methods of gathering abortion stats.

If we're to spend tax dollars gathering abortion stats, we should do it right.

(And this doesn't even deal with late-term abortions per se).

Kudos to Patricia Maloney!

Saturday, December 03, 2011

Remember when I said pro-lifers should encourage pro-life youth to become medical professionals?

It would be to do something like this.

Picture this:

Imagine if close to every abortion clinic in Canada, there was a clinic staff by accredited doctors, nurses, social workers and other professionals to help abortion-minded women have their babies (on top of helping patients with their typical complaints).

The sidewalk counsellors wouldn't refer abortion-minded women to a crisis pregnancy centre staffed with volunteers, but a clinic .

No longer would they be accused of impeding healthcare. They could recommend a second opinion.

The only caveat I would have is that it should not be funded by tax dollars. Because once you accept money from the government, there are strings attached.

This could take sidewalk counselling and the fight against abortion to a whole new level.

Friday, December 02, 2011

Catholic quote of the day from Cardinal Ouellet on Bishops

"Today, especially in the context of our secularized societies, we need bishops who are the first evangelizers, and not mere administrators of dioceses. Who are capable of proclaiming the Gospel. Who are not only theologically faithful to the magisterium and the pope, but are also capable of expounding and, if need be, of defending the faith publicly."

From your mouth to God's ears, Your Eminence!

Cardinal Ouellet notes that a number of candidates refuse appointments because they are intimidated by the job, as the Church is under attack from various quarters, and there are sexual scandals to deal with.

I can understand why candidates would want to avoid dealing with the scandals and not be vilified in the public square.

But if you're a priest who is a strong defender of Catholic orthodoxy, please note:

We need you. We need you badly.

We need men who will speak out and tell it like it is. I think the model for that is Archbishop Charles Chaput. He does not mince words. He identifies the problems in plain English and states the solutions, without no beating around the bush. Oh that every diocese had a bishop like him!

The faithful need bread. They need the bread of truth, and the bishops have to give it to the people. They have to insist that their priests give it, and that their seminaries create the expectation that they will give it.

The speech of Catholic prelates today is generally pap. It's so thin, it's responsible for the spiritual anorexia the faithful suffer. The faithful want meat. We think seekers want pap, but in fact, they can get that anywhere else in our society. You can't get Catholicism anywhere else except in the Catholic Church, so why not offer it whole instead of pureed beyond recognition?

Orthodox Catholics today would rather turn to their computers than their priests for spiritual guidance. That's wrong. The priests should be doing what the laity get from web pages.

Ban on Christmas decorations in Quebec quickly overturned

That was quick.
Human Resources Minister Diane Finley said there was no Canada-wide directive against Yuletide decor. By the end of the day, she issued a statement that she was asking Service Canada to send a new directive to employees telling them they can “celebrate Christmas or the holidays as they please. This includes decorations in Service Canada offices across Canada.”

Who in their right mind is actually bothered by Christmas? Seriously? Who genuinely minds people putting up evergreens and mistletoe to make the season look a little more festive?

I want to know who these people are. And are they the ones who insist on banning Christmas?

Let's get this out in the open. Let's find out what their beef is against Christmas and why they think the majority of the population shouldn't celebrate it in public.

Maybe someone should commission a poll.

No Christmas Decorations Allowed in Service Canada Centres

This article in Canoe.ca reports that there will be no Christmas decorations allowed in Service Canada Centres. The decision was made by the Executive Director Marc Simoneau. The decision was made in the face of complaints about religious beliefs.

I am DISGUSTED. For goodness sakes SHOW SOME TOLERANCE. Does it REALLY hurt you to have a Christmas tree in a Service Canada Centre?

This is ridiculous. I almost feel like organizing a protest for this. Where does this self-effacement end?

Bad euthanasia argument

He warned that banning assisted suicide only serves to create "back alleys for assisted dying," where terminally ill people end their lives even sooner knowing there is no legal option towards the end of their illness.

The euthanasia movement lacks a doomsday scenario to bolster their argument. They're saying in effect that if people don't get killed by a doctor they're going to do it themselves or get some hack to do it to them.

Either way they're dead.

I'm sorry terminally ill people, this thing about legalizing euthanasia, it's not just about you.


Thursday, December 01, 2011

VIDEO: Bethlehemian Rhapsody

Gather round with the kids. So hokey it's funny. Very creative:



H/T: Creative Minority Report.

Pope urges end to death penalty worldwide

Frankly, I wish Western Catholics would get up to speed on this:

The Catechism of the Catholic Church says that the traditional teaching of the Church “does not exclude” recourse to the death penalty when it is “the only practicable way to defend the lives of human beings effectively against the aggressor.” It adds, however, that today such cases are “very rare, if not practically non-existent.”

In my experience, pro-life Canadian Catholics tend to be very anti-death penalty.

Breaking a Taboo about Parenting an Autistic Child

Facing Autism in New Brunswick alerted me to the existence of this blogpost regarding a subject that doesn't often come up in media discussions about autism:

Parenting an autistic child is violent towards you.

I wanted to publicize it because it's something that needs to be addressed.

This is where the shameful part really kicks in. In any other situation, if someone attacked you, the fight or flight reflex kicks in, but of course you can't fight back when your disabled child attacks you, because that is a child protection issue. Nobody considers that it's also a carer protection issue, and no carer wants to admit that they had the urge to fight back. I didn't want to harm her, and I didn't, but the urge was there. The urges included wanting to tear at her hair, putting my hands on her neck, slapping and punching her. In any other situation that would be accepted as a normal reaction, but when it's your child, it's met with shock and concern that you are an abuser. I repeat again that I did not act on these impulses, I did not harm her, but to be put in that situation is an unbearably hard thing for a parent to cope with.

The thing is: if you fight back and someone sees you doing it, you can be reported to Child Protection. Who can take your kid away, even if your only crime was trying to defend yourself.

Child Protection has this bad habit of assessing your entire parenting strategy and fishing for evidence of poor parenting, even if that was not the reason behind the initial concern.

And lots of us "normal" families engage in practices that may reflect poor parenting, but, on balance, represent the lesser of evils. For instance, you might let your kids eat more chocolate than they should, or go to bed at a late hour, or maybe not bathe as often as they should; or maybe you don't vacuum their bedroom as often as you should...and so forth. And when Child Protection discovers your "poor parenting" it can begin a whole vortex of "interventions".

Parents of autistic children are especially liable because the way you parent an autistic child is not the way you parent a normal kid. Your kid lives on chips and pop because that is literally the only thing they will eat. Your kid goes to bed at 2 a.m. because he's so revved up. You WANT your kid to have a bath everyday, but the kid has a meltdown if the bathwater isn't just right, etc.

I'm sure there are a lot of parents out there who fight back when their kids hit, but they say nothing about it. They hope it doesn't get back to Child Protection. And they live in fear.

What else are you supposed to do when your kid is about to physically harm you and he's almost as big as you are?

And for the record, my autistic daughters are not violent, thank goodness.

I simply wanted to speak out on this, because I can only imagine the isolation these parents must suffer. You can't really talk about it because it raises the spectre of you being an "abusive" parent, especially if you have hit back in the past.

When you parent an autistic child, you often live in a world of extremes, where the rules about normal kids don't apply.  But those who are outside that world often don't understand.




Nothing to see here folks

From an abstract regarding a study on anal cancer screening:

Rare in the general population, anal cancer has reached epidemic proportions among HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM). These cancers are human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated, usually HPV type16, and are analogous to cervical cancer. At present, the rates of anal cancer in this group are 10-fold higher than that of cervical cancer occurring in women in the general population.


Dollars to donuts, no one suggests that gay men:

1) stop having anal sex or
2) stop having numerous "concurrent partnerships".

Because, you know, that would be too obvious. You can't expect sexual restraint from gays, can you?