Saturday, July 04, 2009

This kind of rhetoric supposedly endangers lives but AP publishes it

First of all, I'd like to say to Scott Roeder: Just shut up.

You killed a man and lost just about all of your credibility. Quit while you're ahead. Please!

Now: I wonder-- how did AP break this story?

And why is this a story? Think about it. He sent some pamphlets to a pro-life activist.

That's news?

And isn't this type of language supposed to be potentially fatal. Shouldn't AP take the heat for spreading Roeder's message.

Something tells me they won't be getting any.

This just smells like an opportunity to beat up on the pro-life movement. They didn't even get ANY reaction from pro-life OR pro-abortion forces (not that they would really NEED the latter).

And people still deny that the media is biased.