As if anyone gets off on the sight of dead children.
It's bad enough these human beings are killed, the representation of their dead bodies are likened to pornography. It`s not enough that you don`t think they have a right to life? You have to disrespect the images of their dead bodies?
Such bizarre and callous advice indicates how little the CCBR understands the pro-choice view and human psychology in general.
A woman who is in favour of legal third trimester elective abortions, who has no qualms about having a doctor stick a needle in the heart of a baby and pump him full of potassium chloride no moral right to give anyone a lesson on the subject of how not to be callous.
Here is a picture of my daughter at 31 weeks gestation. It is not "porn".
As far as the pro-life movement is concerned, Joyce Arthur is the gift that keeps on giving. She has no idea how crazy she sounds to the average person denouncing pro-lifers for upholding the right to life while she herself protects the right to kill the unborn right up until birth. The irony is not lost on people.
And by the way, regarding the tissue emitted from this early abortion, it's well-known that abortion supporters always hide what happens to the fetus/embryo.
If you want to be REALLY honest Joyce, show before/after pictures of embryos and fetuses that undergo abortion at various stages of pregnancy. Don't show placenta-- nobody cares about that.
Abortions happen at all stages of gestation in Canada. So it's hypocritical to hide behind the "that's not a typical abortion" meme. The picture of the dead babies is the picture of what you support. Own it. v
