Whether or not Gosnell was guilty of murdering any of these babies hinged not on the question of whether or not Gosnell killed them. (He'd never denied that he'd killed them.) It hinged on the question of whether he "ensured fetal demise" before or after the baby fully emerged from the birth canal.
For the babies, of course, the difference was irrelevant.
Snip a born baby: horrors!
Snip a baby in the birth canal: Cool!
If a baby has to die in the name of female autonomy, then tough luck babies! Right feminists? Right.
She calls for her readers to donate to the Gosnell movie.
It's so important that this happens.
They're about $234 000 short. Please consider donating if you haven't done so.