Monday, December 08, 2014

Abortion Supporter Fears "Abortion Reversal"

I think our main concern here should be for the children we’re supposedly “saving.” Will “reverse abortion” babies be healthy? Will they suffer from side-effects of the treatment? Will they suffer brain damage? Will they develop normally? Those answers should be available already. And they’re not, which is terrifying and unacceptable.

We're "supposedly" saving.

Because wanting them dead is really saving them.

We're concerned that they might have brain damage.

Death? Not so much.

Whatever happened to "my body, my choice"?

If a woman wants to ingest Progesterone to reverse an abortion, who are we to tell her otherwise?

If the baby dies from the progesterone pill in an attempt to save him, then there's no "loss". The abortion would have happened anyway.

If the baby survives, although the baby has damage, who's to say that's not due to the first pill, the abortion pill, to begin with?

But even then, the baby survives, and that's still a plus. It's only abortion supporters who think a disabled baby is a bad thing.

I think Planned Parenthood should offer abortion reversal. It's a "choice" after all.